Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Colonel Kangaroo

I believe that a traitor is a traitor, and should be treated acordingly. In the North, Valdingham was a traitor to his home, etc. and could have been punished accordingly.
By the same standard, Unionist in the South, should have been and in many cases were as well.


902 posted on 05/27/2007 9:33:02 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 895 | View Replies ]


To: TexConfederate1861
That's a good and evenhanded answer. We can often tend to focus on heavy-handed behavior of the other side and overlook that on our side.

Both sides sometimes had to play rough, but I feel that the Confederates shed much more blood of its own people than the Union did. Part of this was undoubtedly due to the fact the reb areas contained almost all the armed conflict, but I think that the nature of the CSA lent itself to the prominence of a class of stay at home parasites who enriched themselves while better men put their lives on the line in fair combat.

907 posted on 05/27/2007 9:44:00 AM PDT by Colonel Kangaroo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]

To: TexConfederate1861
By the same standard, Unionist in the South, should have been and in many cases were as well.

Is a man a traitor who remains loyal to his first cause when those around him switch theirs? Is he a traitor to his honor, or to the herd?

929 posted on 05/27/2007 3:39:09 PM PDT by LexBaird (Yet another Famously Frisky FReeper!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 902 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson