Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

” OK, so had the South won would the slogan be “government of 2/3rds of the people, by 2/3rds of the people, for 2/3rds of the people?””

What was in the Constitution agreed to by all the colonies in 1783? The above.

“Fine, but don’t forget to mention that your rebellion was launched in no small part to keep a considerable part of your population from enjoying that very same freedom and liberty that you claim to have been fighting for”

Lincoln didn’t fight the war to end slavery. If you had clue one you’d understand that.


90 posted on 05/24/2007 6:59:24 AM PDT by FredHunter08 (Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]


To: FredHunter08
What was in the Constitution agreed to by all the colonies in 1783? The above.

So that's what the South meant when they said they were trying to preserve the Constitution?

Lincoln didn’t fight the war to end slavery. If you had clue one you’d understand that.

No, he fought it to preserve the Union and because war was the path that Jefferson Davis chose. The question really is why the South chose armed rebellion in the first place and defense of their institution of slavery was by far the most important reason for their decision.

101 posted on 05/24/2007 7:04:35 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

To: FredHunter08

No doubt which of the two countries would have been more conservative.


700 posted on 05/25/2007 3:44:59 AM PDT by catfish1957 (Pelosi, Kennedy, Reid, Remember those names as you firmly hold on to your pocketbook and rights.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson