Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: servantboy777

Very good post. I have read so many stories of the love between a lot of slaves and their families. It has been totally rewritten, though. Sure slavery was wrong but the myth that slaves were regularly beaten and killed is wrong.


353 posted on 05/24/2007 9:38:19 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 208 | View Replies ]


To: beckysueb
There were evil people back then just as there are today.

The majority of people from all races, all nations have a few things in common.

Raise a family, work, trust in a higher being “God”, enjoy family time and so forth.

I refuse to buy into the myth that everyone in the south was oppressive.

It doesn’t matter what color your skin happens to be, we are all God’s children.

I really look up to Dr. King. He in my opinion was set in motion by the creator to right a terrible wrong.

We learned our lessons, we as a nation are for the most part past all this....that is if we stop giving the poverty pimps face time on T.V.

There are those who wish to keep this race division going for profit. Purely shameful.

415 posted on 05/24/2007 11:05:19 AM PDT by servantboy777
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

To: beckysueb
I have read so many stories of the love between a lot of slaves and their families.
When mutilated masters returned from the bloodbath, some slaves raged as well as wept. "Dey brung" Massa Billy home, one South Carolina slave grieved to a contemporary, "with he jaw split open . . . He teeth all shine through he cheek. . . . I be happy iffen I could kill me jes’ one Yankee. I hated dem ’cause dey hurt my white people."
William W. Freehling, The South Vs. The South: How Anti-Confederate Southerners Shaped the Course of the Civil War, New York NY: Oxford University Press, 2001, p. 90.

Sure slavery was wrong but the myth that slaves were regularly beaten and killed is wrong.

Some even carried guns, but the revisionists would one believe therwise.

Other aspects of the new work regimen operated to the slaves’ advantage. Slave lumbermen, many of them hired out for short periods of time, carried axes and, like slave drovers and herdsmen, were generally armed with knives and guns – necessities for men who worked in the wild and hunted animals for food and furs. Woodsmen had access to horses, as did slaves who tended cattle and swine. Periodic demands that slaveowners disarm their slaves and restrict their access to horses and mules confirmed that many believed these to be dangerous practices, but they did nothing to halt them. In short, slave lumbermen and drovers were not to be trifled with. Their work allowed considerable mobility and latitude in choosing their associates and bred a sense of independence, not something planters wanted to encourage. Slaves found it a welcome relief from the old plantation order.
Ira Berlin. Generations of Captivity: A History of African-American Slaves, Boston, MA: Harvard Univerity Press, 2004, pp. 90-91.

1,172 posted on 05/30/2007 9:17:39 AM PDT by 4CJ (Annoy a liberal, honour Christians and our gallant Confederate dead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 353 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson