Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Lee'sGhost
Yes. It tells us that the Confederate government did not want to exceed its power by giving away property that did not belong to them.

Really? The confederate government had no problems with levying slave labor without compensation 'for the war effort'. They had no problem taking property that didn't belong to them by placing quotas on agricultural produce or reserving cargo space on private packet ships, again 'for the war effort'. That, apparently, isn't exceeding their powers. Or if it was they didn't care. But you would have us believe they had constitutional qualms about freeing slaves that fought for them against the Union?

348 posted on 05/24/2007 9:34:49 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

Once again I am reduced to explaining the simplest things.

“The confederate government had no problems with levying slave labor without compensation ‘for the war effort’.”

Big difference between borrowing and giving away.

“They had no problem taking property that didn’t belong to them by placing quotas on agricultural produce or reserving cargo space on private packet ships, again ‘for the war effort’.”

Hmmmm. . . similar tactics used by the U.S. during WWI, WWII, etc. Suppose the U.S. government was wrong there.

“That, apparently, isn’t exceeding their powers. Or if it was they didn’t care.” Same as above.

“But you would have us believe they had constitutional qualms about freeing slaves that fought for them against the Union?”

I just follow the facts and logic. You believe whatever you want.


423 posted on 05/24/2007 11:18:56 AM PDT by Lee'sGhost (Crom! Non-Sequitur = Pee Wee Herman.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 348 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson