Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Most of the people were poor. They wouldn’t have been able to afford slaves. The rich landowners were the ones mostly who owned slaves. I don’t feel like looking back over this long long thread but I seem to recall that you, yourself, said that most of the southern people were opposed to slavery and that the politicians and landowners were forcing their views on everyone.


1,358 posted on 06/01/2007 9:06:34 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1357 | View Replies ]


To: beckysueb
Most of the people were poor. They wouldn’t have been able to afford slaves. The rich landowners were the ones mostly who owned slaves.

Slave ownership was very much a middle class institution in the South. Men like Thomas Jackson, a university instructor, owne as many as 10 at one time. Statistically speaking in states like South Carolina or Mississippi close to half of all families owned slaves. And many of those who did not own slaves made their living off of those that did.

I don’t feel like looking back over this long long thread but I seem to recall that you, yourself, said that most of the southern people were opposed to slavery and that the politicians and landowners were forcing their views on everyone.

I can assure you that you're wrong on that. I've never taken that position. On the contrary I'm not aware of any real opposition to slavery in the South, and freely admit that there was very little opposition to it in the North.

1,359 posted on 06/01/2007 9:13:51 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson