Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: beckysueb
My point is it would probably be very inconvenient for awhile if Kalifornia were to secede but do you really think a bunch of liberals could stand on their own 2 feet for very long much less run a country.

No offense meant but I just had to chuckle at that response. If you look at the newspaper articles, especially from Greeley's paper, of the period that's pretty much the same position they were taking in 1861 before the Southern states started the war. Everything old is new again.

1,355 posted on 06/01/2007 7:40:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1353 | View Replies ]


To: Non-Sequitur

My point is, maybe the north should have taken that position. Just let the south secede and gave them Sumpter. If they could run things ok and become a good neighbor, fine. Slavery would have been abolished anyway. It was just to big a travesty to continue. The goodness in people would have eventually elected politicians who wound have abolished slavery. Actually, the vast majority of people in the south did not own slaves and were against it.


1,356 posted on 06/01/2007 8:06:31 AM PDT by beckysueb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1355 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson