Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur

Yes... I do... are we quibbling now? Are we about to about to debate the meaning of is...


1,316 posted on 05/31/2007 12:40:04 PM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1314 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
Yes... I do... are we quibbling now? Are we about to about to debate the meaning of is...

Not unless you want to. The information you posted talked of the dangers of reinforcing the fort. Re-inforce means to strengthen or increase your positon, as in adding additional forces. Resupply means to restock, as in food and supplies. I think all can agree that had Lincoln announced his intention to reinforce the garrison then that would have been an escalation of the issue and could be seen as nothing but what it would have been, a provocative act. But Lincoln was faced with a garrison rapidly running out of food. He wanted nothing more than to maintain the status quo. Not to reinforce Sumter. Not to threaten the confederacy. Not to escalate the issue. But to keep the situation the way it was. Neither side gains, neither side loses. That's why he made his intention clear in his letter to Pickens, and also made it clear that he intended to land food and supplies only. No arms or ammunition. No reinforcements. And that is why there is no reason to believe that Lincoln knew his actions should automatically end in war. Regardless of your opinion.

1,317 posted on 05/31/2007 12:56:12 PM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1316 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson