Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Again... you are arguing without the South being an active agent in the story. This is not just about what Lincoln knew and Lincoln did.

It is also about what the South told him they would do.

Put those two events together... and then you can make an historial evaluation.

You spend too much time defending Lincoln's choices and defining my positions. Stop the blaming and stop defending and stop propagandizing.

Just answer the question.

Did Lincoln know that if he sailed those ships into the harbor, the fighting would start?

And no you did not answer my question in your post...

1,241 posted on 05/31/2007 5:50:17 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1233 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
It is also about what the South told him they would do.

When exactly did the confederate authorities make this clear to him? Lincoln was told by a lot of people that his actions would lead to war. Hurlburt gave his opinion, Lamon gave his, other people added their impressions as well. But if any person in power in the Davis government threatened it then I'm not aware of it. Lincoln was no doubt acting on the hope that cooler heads would prevail, not knowing that there were no cool heads down there. Might Lincoln also have been resigned to the fact that absent a complete surrender to all their demands, the South would start a war regardless of what he did? Maybe. We will never know for sure.

1,245 posted on 05/31/2007 6:08:19 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1241 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson