Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Non-Sequitur
Now, you have changed your argument. Yesterday, you said Lincoln wanted peace... was not looking for a fight. Today, it is Lincoln with a shrug of the shoulders saying, cest la guerre.

Which is it?

1,228 posted on 05/31/2007 3:57:52 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1227 | View Replies ]


To: carton253
Now, you have changed your argument. Yesterday, you said Lincoln wanted peace... was not looking for a fight.

I'm not changing anything. Lincoln wasn't looking for war but what choices did he have? Of course, you would say he could have surrendered Sumter. But what would that have solved? Rebel focus would have immediately switched to Fort Pickens and then Fort Jefferson until there wasn't anything left to surrender. And at that point, having seized everything they wanted, what was left for the sides to talk about and what position could the U.S. have negotiated from? If there was going to be a negotiated settlement to the situation then Lincoln had to take his stand. He wasn't about to allow the garrison in Sumter to be starved into surrender, so he chose to resupply in the least provocative manner he could. He informed Governor Pickens of his intent and left the question of war or continued status quo in their hands. They chose war. So if anyone leaped into war with a shrug of their shoulders it was the South.

1,229 posted on 05/31/2007 4:09:19 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson