Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: rustbucket
Already in 1858 at Vicksburg, Davis declared that if a Republican were elected he "would rather appeal to the God of Battles than attempt to live longer in such a Union" even if the result was blood flowing in torrents.

Davis was one of those politicians who talked one way in Washington and the North and another way at home. Maybe all politicians are more or less like that, and if their doubletalk brings good results for the country we forgive them, but Davis's duplicity had the worst possible results.

Davis showed the same duplicity and inability to admit what he was actually doing in his battles within his Democratic Party. Davis couldn't bring himself to admit that his actions were splitting the party and dooming it to defeat.

You can see the same pattern in the weeks leading up to the beginning of war. On March 6, 1861, over a month before firing on Fort Sumter, Davis and the Confederate Congress called for an army of 100,000 volunteers, a force much larger than the US Army. Was that the action of a man who wanted peace?

In his last speech in Congress in January, 1861, Davis had attacked Buchanan for not surrendering Sumter. He had months afterwards to figure out what to do if the United States refused to relinquish the fort, as he had every reason to expect that they wouldn't. And what did he come up with? Nothing, except force. Almost as if he wanted the war to solidify his government's position.

1,203 posted on 05/30/2007 3:48:09 PM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1152 | View Replies ]


To: x
You can see the same pattern in the weeks leading up to the beginning of war. On March 6, 1861, over a month before firing on Fort Sumter, Davis and the Confederate Congress called for an army of 100,000 volunteers, a force much larger than the US Army. Was that the action of a man who wanted peace?

I think the call for the large CSA army was in direct response to Lincoln's first inaugural speech of a few days earlier. It was widely interpreted in the South and in Democratic circles in the North that Lincoln's speech was a in effect declaration of war. See A Declaration of War?.

Here is a newspaper item dated March 5, 1861:

Latest from Montgomery

War considered Inevitable -- The Standing Army -- The War Strength

Montgomery, March 5 -- Since the receipt of the Inaugural address of Mr. Lincoln, it is universally conceded here that war between the Confederate States and the United States is inevitable. Mr. Benjamin said last night, that in his opinion, there would be a clash of Arms within thirty days.

Mr. Conrad concurred in this view of the aspect of affairs. The standing army of the Confederate States will be fixed at ten thousand men. Congress is now engaged in organizing the army. Of course, in case of hostilities, the number of men put in the field will be greater. It is calculated that the States now composing the Confederacy can place 80,000 on a movable war footing. [Source: Gazette and Sentinel, Plaquemine, Louisiana, March 9, 1861]

In such a situation, Davis would have been remiss if he did not prepare for what might happen. Here's the first part of the March 6 act that authorized Davis to call for volunteers if and when needed:

The Congress of the Confederate States of America do enact, That in order to provide speedily forces to repel invasion, maintain the rightful possession of the Confederate States of America in every portion of territory belonging to each State, and to secure the public tranquility and independence against threatened assault, the President be, and he is hereby authorized to employ the militia, military and naval forces of the Confederate States of America, and to ask for and accept the services of any number of volunteers, not exceeding one hundred thousand, who may offer their services, either as cavalry, mounted riflemen, artillery or infantry, in such proportion of these several arms as he may deem expedient, to serve for twelve months after they shall be mustered into service, unless sooner discharged.

I note that these volunteers were intended to protect against invasion, maintain possessions (no doubt including forts) within the Confederacy, and secure independence against threatened assault.

what did he [Davis] come up with? Nothing, except force. Almost as if he wanted the war to solidify his government's position.

Nothing except force is incorrect, but he may indeed have wanted to solidify his government's position by firing on the fort to precipitate the secession of border states. Lincoln probably had ulterior motives as well. Lincoln wanted to get the North solidly behind him, and provoking the South into a fight was certainly one way to do it. As I've said on these threads before, IMO Davis blundered by firing on Fort Sumter. It would have been better for the Confederacy if he had waited for a situation where Lincoln was more clearly in the wrong. (That's easy for me to say almost 150 years after the fact.)

1,220 posted on 05/30/2007 7:43:38 PM PDT by rustbucket
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies ]

To: x
"You can see the same pattern in the weeks leading up to the beginning of war. On March 6, 1861, over a month before firing on Fort Sumter, Davis and the Confederate Congress called for an army of 100,000 volunteers, a force much larger than the US Army. Was that the action of a man who wanted peace?"

President Reagan demonstrated that is precisely the action of a man that wants peace through his "Peace Thru Strength" policy regarding the Soviet Union. Being prepared for war often times insures that a war will not become necessary.

1,222 posted on 05/30/2007 9:47:02 PM PDT by Rabble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1203 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson