Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

What Does It Mean "The South Shall Rise Again":
The Wichita (KS) Eagle ^ | 23 May 2007 | Mark McCormick

Posted on 05/24/2007 6:03:30 AM PDT by Rebeleye

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,541-1,557 next last
To: LexBaird

I disagree, Washington was the most beloved PRESIDENT.


1,041 posted on 05/29/2007 3:54:57 AM PDT by TexConfederate1861 (Surrender means that the history of this heroic struggle will be written by the enemy.......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 928 | View Replies]

To: confederatetrappedinmidwest
I have no business living in a place I hate as much as I have come to hate Michigan.

If you hate where you're living, then leave. Otherwise shut up about it. And I would offer that same advice to anyone who moves South and discovers that things down there are different than they were 'back home'. They should either accept the change or get their butt back North where they came from.

1,042 posted on 05/29/2007 3:56:24 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 999 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
Yes, it is. Take Bill and Hillary, for instance. Bill Clinton is well respected and much loved and Hillary is a presidential candidate. Funny indeed.

Hilarious. Bill Clinton was a Southern governor long before he got foisted on the rest of us. Same with Jimmy Carter, another solid son of the South.

1,043 posted on 05/29/2007 3:58:01 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1006 | View Replies]

To: durasell
Keep reading (my next post) ... cause your post to me is not unexpected. Heck, it wouldn't be a Civil War without it.

You get points off for lack of originality though. This thread hardly needs another "the other side does it too" post.

1,044 posted on 05/29/2007 3:58:13 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1038 | View Replies]

To: smug
Okay! I'll bite, how'd you get all that from a speech by James Madison. On the other hand denial was one of his fault's

I thought we were still talking about Davis's book? That's were I was looking for you favorite quotes from.

1,045 posted on 05/29/2007 3:59:07 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1007 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
Not for the North, no.

But it was for the South. That bears repeating as well.

1,046 posted on 05/29/2007 4:04:33 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1008 | View Replies]

To: beckysueb
You call it the War of Southern Rebellion and call southerners fanatics. LOL

That was the official name for the 50 years following the rebellion. It's also the most accurate name.

1,047 posted on 05/29/2007 4:06:04 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1016 | View Replies]

To: mkjessup
What Does It Mean "The South Shall Rise Again":

New Viagra ad? /flame retardent sheet ON!





peace brethern, it's just a joke.
1,048 posted on 05/29/2007 4:07:13 AM PDT by Cronos ("Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faith, but to become dominant" - Omar Ahmed, CAIR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: carton253
The South was looking for a fight. There is no denying that. Beauregard in Charleston was itching to fire on those forts.

And yet all of your Southron cohorts would have us believe that the entire blame for the conflict lies with Lincoln. I give you credit for admitting that the South was looking for an excuse.

1,049 posted on 05/29/2007 4:07:55 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies]

To: lentulusgracchus
Yeah, just like you did Charleston and Atlanta.

At the risk of sounding like I'm stooping to your Nazi analogies, the South has no more reason to complain about Atlanta as the Germans have to complain about Berlin or the Japanese about Tokyo. Once you accept war as your policy you lose the right to complain when it doesn't work out like you had planned.

1,050 posted on 05/29/2007 4:09:43 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1026 | View Replies]

To: carton253
Sorry, hit enter too soon.

Did either side really want a war? I honestly don't know. I think that Lincoln was trying to do whatever he could to avoid one while at the same time hanging on to the remaining federal property in the South. But did he really, honestly believe that there could be a peaceful resolution? I don't know for sure. I think that the South was a little more anxious to resort to war believing, as you pointed out, that it would be a short and fairly bloodless one. But once the die had been cast at Charleston there was no more desire on the North to rein in the dogs of war than there was in Richmond.

1,051 posted on 05/29/2007 4:13:16 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1023 | View Replies]

To: napscoordinator
You can lead a yankee to the truth, but that doesn’t overcome years of public schooling and indoctrination of the terminally brain dead.

Nor does it entirely counteract generations of Southron myth.

1,052 posted on 05/29/2007 4:13:59 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1032 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
You are as ardent in your defense of Lincoln's innocence in starting the war are as you are in your haste to place the blame entirely on the South.

You are no different from the "southern cohorts" you complain against. No different at all.

Lincoln resupplied Ft. Sumter because he was looking for a fight. Beauregard was happy to oblige.

I don't think it is an accident that you agreed to half my post and not the other half.

1,053 posted on 05/29/2007 4:14:04 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1049 | View Replies]

To: carton253

I believe you are correct — both sides were looking for a fight (a quick one) that would define the country.

The point of contention throughout this entire thread is the South’s apparent inability to “let it go.”


1,054 posted on 05/29/2007 4:19:04 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1053 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
Actually, both sides wanted war because they thought it would be quick and easy.

I like Lincoln. Thought he was a good tough politician. Because I admire his politicial skills, I do not tie myself up in the knots you do trying to justify what he did at Ft. Sumter. You can't have it both ways. He can't be the smart politician he was and be surprised at what happened at Sumter. The two don't mesh. Tey don't have too. We really don't have a dog in this fight so we can be honest about all the players.

He pushed the South, and the South back.

1,055 posted on 05/29/2007 4:24:02 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1051 | View Replies]

To: durasell; Non-Sequitur
Well, I think what is good for the goose is good for the gander. The Civil War is always good for 1,000 to 2,000 post threads because both sides can't let it go. I find the whole history fascinating... but more so the battles.

Heck, I think Non-Sequitur gets a text alert everytime a thread goes up because he is on them like white on rice. I would just like to see some more originality in the threads. It does get boring having the same argument all the time.

1,056 posted on 05/29/2007 4:27:11 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1054 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
I wrote: He pushed the South and the South pushed back.

I could have very easily written: The South pushed him and he pushed back.

Both responses - how American. How American of them...

You push me... I'll push you right back.

That's what I love about this history. It is so American.

1,057 posted on 05/29/2007 4:29:49 AM PDT by carton253 (I've cried tears and stayed the same.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1055 | View Replies]

To: carton253

It was one of those defining moments in our nation’s history.

However — and speaking as a northerner — I find the continued conflict and bitterness around the Civil War on the part of Southerners a little unsettling.


1,058 posted on 05/29/2007 4:30:34 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1056 | View Replies]

To: carton253; Non-Sequitur

I’m off to work — not running away.

Take care


1,059 posted on 05/29/2007 4:31:58 AM PDT by durasell (!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1057 | View Replies]

To: carton253
Lincoln resupplied Ft. Sumter because he was looking for a fight. Beauregard was happy to oblige.

If he really wanted that then he went about it in a most unusual manner. Telling the South exactly what his intentions were, allowing them the choice to accept status quo or start a war. Had he wanted war I think he would have been more obvious about it. Move the forces in without prior warning. Intend to reinforce regardless instead of peacefully resupply.

1,060 posted on 05/29/2007 4:34:02 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur (Save Fredericksburg. Support CVBT.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1053 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,021-1,0401,041-1,0601,061-1,080 ... 1,541-1,557 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson