Absolutely. But when you have one group of terrorists slaughtering that many in the present, and one group that merely wants to do so but shows no ability to do so, it’d be foolish to worry about the latter more than the former.
That can all change in a blink of an eye, as 9/11 showed us. Here's my point and obviously Mr. Robinson's, as well, IF I understand his position correctly; wagglebee claims all the R candidates are claiming they will fight the War On Terror.
Sen. McCain, obviously doesn't, based upon his comments regarding Guantanamo prisoners. He's supposed to be a serious candidate? How many reps/sens/pres candidates, find their views on abortion on the road to Washington.
I would have more respect for a Republican candidate who said "Abortion is a personal issue, etc." and didn't do the obligatory dance around. What is a Conservative going to say about a candidate that believes Roe should be overturned so it can go back the states and if state X wants to make abortion legal, that's the choice of the voters?
Given the choice between a candidate who says, "I will continue the War on Terror." and a candidate who says, "Abortion is my primary issue.". The choice will be simple. Mr. Robinson laid out a comprehensive platform for Conservatives. Quite a good one, I say.
We are debating on seriously points, while our opponents discuss fluff. How many of their voters are going to stay home on Election Day to show their reps?