Political Observers Suggest Rudy Giuliani Drop "I Hate Abortion" Language

Life News ^ | 5/23/07 | Steven Ertelt

[wagglebee]

Mr. Robinson laid out a comprehensive platform for Conservatives. Quite a good one, I say.

And Rudy CLEARLY DOES NOT FIT INTO JIM ROBINSON'S PLAN!

[olde north church]

NOBODY has said that abortion is their “primary” issue. And NOBODY except Ron Paul has said that they won’t fight terrorism.

YOU seem to be operating under the delusion that a president can only focus on one issue at a time. And anyone who can only do this IS NOT QUALIFIED to be president. Additionally, YOU seem willing to ignore Rudy’s liberalism based on the erroneous assumption that he is qualified to fight terrorism.

One more time, LOUDLY,

You obviously have no problem with John McCain's coddling of Guantanamo prisoners. To me, that's being soft on terror.

Rudy Giuliani is the only candidate who hasn't RUN from the tactics being used.

You presume, I'm a Giuliani supporter, you presume incorrectly. I'm not ignoring anything about him. About the only way Giuliani will get my vote is if he makes the top of the Republican Presidential ticket 11/08.

Stop misrepresenting my position on the issues.

[cgk]

Pro-Life/Pro-Baby Ping!

Please FReepmail me if you would like to be added to, or removed from, the Pro-Life/Pro-Baby ping list...

[Beagle8U]

“Your stay at home, take my ball and go home antics put a Democrat Majority in both houses of Congress and now you’re getting ready to play the same game. You’re not principled, you’re clueless”

Rooty if he were to get nominated would guarantee that about 35% of the Republican party stays home, leaves that line blank, or votes third party/write in.

How does the party keep RATS from winning with that?

You mention national security as a big issue. Please list all of Rooty’s special qualifications or accomplishments on that issue?

Perhaps its you that should buy a clue.

[Sir Francis Dashwood]

I would prefer he not quit until I'm positive there is no President Hillary or other Democrat on the horizon. But then again, abortion is much more important than national security.

WHAT NATIONAL SECURITY???

War?

Border?

Invasion?

Terrorism?

2nd Amendment?

[Señor Zorro]

Well, good for wagglebee. I'm against abortion, as well. Zealotous. Vehement. I am a realist. Without a strong defense all else is moot.

Zealotry and "Realism" (translate Compromise) are exclusive. Or are you unfamiliar with what zealotry Definition (from the American Heritage Dictionary at Bartleby.com) Zealotry: excessive zeal; fanaticism. Does a fanatic actually compromise? By definition, he does not.

I want to ask you a few questions. How many people do you think will die if the WOT is not properly prosecuted? Millions? how many do you think die by the abortionist's scalpel? We are not discussing chasing the guy who took aunt Bertha's purse. We are talking about mass murder. If you do not accept this, then why are you against abortion?

If you prosecute the WOT successfully at the cost of these "social" issues, what is it that you have really protected? If the liberals are allowed their way on abortion, homosexuality, and such what was really won by winning the WOT? It sounds more like a Faustian bargain than anything

What makes Giuliani the up and coming savior? Why is it that it ONLY he can win either the election or the WOT? The whole thing reminds me of Kerry. Somehow, the MSM was insisting that John Kerry had all of this credibility and would restore the US's standing on the world. The promises always rung hollow. What made Kerry so incredibly wonderful? Likewise, what makes it so that we need Giuliani so badly?