No, the won't have any money to buy any more anything after you blow the living hell out of their oil industry. And sink their tankers. And sink any ship trying to get from NK to Iran. And sink any Iranian vessel trying to interfer with shipping in the gulf. Iran is a pipsqueak country that took 8 years to stalemate Iraq, which we butchered in 3 weeks. Being deterred by them is a ridiculous delusion.
The dems would not support motherhood or apple pie if they heard the communist party denounce them. Irrelevant, asking for permission from notorious felons and traitors is a fool's policy. The president does not need them to secure the country against urgent threats to its security. Bush has nearly zero credibility largely because he continues to pussyfoot around, when the American people want victory yesterday.
The only effect it will have on our presence in Iraq is that we will be able to attack the half of our enemies there currently funded from and operating with impunity and state support from within Iran. Sanctuaries granted to enemies do not shorten guerilla wars or make them more victorious.
The impact on the global economy is to reduce the present risk premium in oil prices by roughly $25 a barrel. Which is there because people expect Iran to run a bomb production line continually without interference, and the Saudis to follow suit to balance against them, and the end result to be a nuclear war in the middle east within one generation. Which no one will win.
Sitting around with a thumb up your tail is exactly what Ahmadinejad wants you to do. It is hardly a concidence that the tendency of your comments coincides precisely with his interests and strategy.
Hello? They support abortion, that's about as far from supporting motherhood as one can get...