Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: JasonC
The domestic opposition isn't doing diddly. Your fine sentiment is a recipe for inaction and inaction means millions of incinerated people within a decade. Not acceptable.

Where did I call for inaction? If you equate inaction to not launching a preemptive nuclear attack on Iran, then I am for inaction. Otherwise, I want us to do what we seem to be doing now, i.e., covertly working for regime change in Iran. The only problem is that ABC decided to make it public.

58 posted on 05/23/2007 5:38:36 PM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies ]


To: kabar
Nobody in Iran is seeking regime change effectively. They talk and ask for support but they are hopelessly cowed and do not act. Facts are stubborn things. Relying on a non-existent, disorganized, unarmed, mythical Iranian opposition to protect the world from imminent Iranian nukes is reckless and stupid, and it is a *recipe* for inaction. It is playing "after you" and passing the buck to somebody else, who will then wait around for somebody else to do something, and around we go, and the centrifuges and media machine spin right along with.

Iran will be prevented from getting nuclear weapons if and when the US gets off its collective ass and breaks their ability to make them.

64 posted on 05/23/2007 7:03:58 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

To: kabar
Oh and if you don't like that transparently fact, then get off your own and overthrow the regime. Yesterday.
65 posted on 05/23/2007 7:04:45 PM PDT by JasonC
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson