Thanks for the interesting post.
There seems to be a lot of misinformation being posted by some regarding:
Isolationism: Actually, Libertarians are not isolationist. Most L-tarians support open borders and liberal free trade...hardly isolationist.
Free Trade: This is a classical liberal idea....taken to the extreme by GOPer free-traders. Actually, what Tancredo proposes, bi-lateral trade....is more beneficial to the US. It is suicidal to have a near trillion dollar trade deficit with Communist China (regardless what some Business-Socialist economists claim). Destroying American business for the sake of trade is nuts.
Iraq: No problem with being there, but when Bush started going Liberal-Globalist (worrying more about the feelings of Islamics instead of US forces) that is when things started sliding down. Bush’s lack of commitment to win is the problem with Iraq....not the being there. My version of “cut and run” would be to “cut the enemy up” and “run them down”. Lets stop pussy-footing around.
Your’s is an excellent post:
There seems to be a lot of misinformation being posted by some regarding:
Isolationism: Actually, Libertarians are not isolationist. Most L-tarians support open borders and liberal free trade...hardly isolationist.
Free Trade: This is a classical liberal idea....taken to the extreme by GOPer free-traders. Actually, what Tancredo proposes, bi-lateral trade....is more beneficial to the US. It is suicidal to have a near trillion dollar trade deficit with Communist China (regardless what some Business-Socialist economists claim). Destroying American business for the sake of trade is nuts.
Iraq: No problem with being there, but when Bush started going Liberal-Globalist (worrying more about the feelings of Islamics instead of US forces) that is when things started sliding down. Bush’s lack of commitment to win is the problem with Iraq....not the being there. My version of “cut and run” would be to “cut the enemy up” and “run them down”. Lets stop pussy-footing around.