Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: janetgreen

I know there is a NAU push, but what could Bush have signed that would in any way be legal?


23 posted on 05/22/2007 2:23:13 PM PDT by stevio ((NRA))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: stevio
Details of the "North American Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America is explained at:

http://www.ailf.org/ipc/infocus/2006_achievingsecurity.shtml

Just like NAFTA had little to do with fair trade for America, the "North American Security and Prosperity Partnership" has little to do with American security and prosperity, it's for Mexico and the slave labor corporations.

First there was NAFTA and CAFTA, then this turkey (signed only by the three "leaders"), not approved by the American people, then the Kansas corridor from Mexico to Kansas, now the immigration amnesty is being pushed (IF YOU WANT THE SHOCK OF YOUR LIFE, READ THAT).

All "agreements" will be financed by you and I and the rest of the American taxpayers, and the amnesty agreement, if passed in its disastrous entirety, will cost us trillions of dollars. It's all for Mexico, just like everything else America is becoming.

I hope everyone is writing, faxing, telephoning and making personal visits to their Senators and Reps, screaming bloody murder. These deals will murder America, and anyone in the Senate or House voting for amnesty should be removed from office (and tarred and feathered).

24 posted on 05/22/2007 4:44:44 PM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson