Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: PghBaldy
I respected Chertoff during the Whitewater hearings and was encouraged to see him named to this position.

However, I have begun to believe that not only must Bush appointees (save the Supremes) tout the Bush policy, they must do so while willingly opposing the American people and the extreme danger to our borders if we leave this system in place for one more day!!!

48 posted on 05/21/2007 7:31:14 PM PDT by zerosix (Native Sunflower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: zerosix

The Questions is...why? What would motivate the leadership to poke a stick in the eye of their supporters?

Answer: One only does that when there is a feeling that the voters’ support is no longer necessary, or to create a false conflict to create an highly motivated re-action among the supporters.

So, which is it? Do they no longer care if we support them, or are they trying to make us react against this conduct, since Bush and his administration are not here any longer after the next election anyway?

This far,I assume that they are already lined up to accept a Democrat as the new President, since it must be their turn again.

America, as taught in text books, has not existed for a long time when it comes to national offices. We may still be able to elect the “dog catcher,” but not much else.


145 posted on 05/21/2007 8:49:11 PM PDT by LachlanMinnesota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson