Who are you, the Debate Fairy? Wave your magic wand and mitigating circumstances just disappear?
News Flash, sport...you don't get to define reality from your ivory tower. The fact you don't seem to know that makes me wonder if handling you with a butterfly net is more appropriate than a computer.
And, according to post #48, Pollard was trying to give away any information he could, including the CIA cafeteria menu.
I notice post #48 makes no mention of Pollard being arrested after he was turned away from the Israeli embassy, either. So what else do you think PBS might have missed?
You really should think twice before using them as a primary source.
You're using an old debating tactic called "changing the subject and waiting a few millenia between posts.
The only debating tactic I need is called "being informed." As I've alread said, it's excruciatingly obvious you'll only investigate a matter until you can support what you wanted to believe in the first place.
Instead of whining about me living a life instead of mopping the rhetorical floor with you, why don't you use that time to actually read some opposing viewpoints instead of hiding behind any flack that will tell you what you want to hear?
It’s a short article.
And yet, you’ve only picked at irrelevant points that PBS seemed to have left out, without addressing the points that are actually there.
Brevity being the soul of wit, I note that your posts themselves are getting longer.