To: sukhoi-30mki
The missile, known as JASSM, is designed to destroy high-value, well-defended, fixed and relocatable targets. For $5.8 billion, they'd darn well better be going after "high-value" targets.
2 posted on
05/21/2007 5:50:46 AM PDT by
glorgau
To: sukhoi-30mki
It is unfortunate that in a lot of cases generals have a hard time killing off worthless systems at the earliest possible point.
3 posted on
05/21/2007 8:53:06 AM PDT by
RJS1950
(The democrats are the "enemies foreign and domestic" cited in the federal oath)
To: sukhoi-30mki
Just Another Sub Sonic Missile.
4 posted on
05/21/2007 5:33:24 PM PDT by
Yo-Yo
(USAF, TAC, 12th AF, 366 TFW, 366 MG, 366 CRS, Mtn Home AFB, 1978-81)
To: sukhoi-30mki
What can the JASSM do that current and future Tomahawk variants cannot? And why is it having so many problems when similar systems like the Euro Scalp EG/StormShadow seemed to come through unscathed?
5 posted on
05/22/2007 5:16:26 AM PDT by
spetznaz
(Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson
