Well, if Bush is 100% authority on everything, why don’t you just follow his policies 100%?
If you dont even realize that Saddam’s IIS had multiple contacts with Al Qaeda, helped set up Zarqawi’s Ansar al-Islam in northern Iraq and offered Bin laden safe haven in 1998, and will just discount the facts for some bumpersticker-level view of saddam ... well, then, the brainwashers got to you, for sure.
Bush’s admission is known as an ‘argument against interest’.
I don’t have to endorse all that he says in order to demonstrate that he acknowledges a claim that runs counter to his own benefit.
Moreover Bush’s admission runs counter to your claim that there was a connection between Saddam and al Qaeda. Your claim is that only the brainwashed believe it isn’t so, which by logic dumps Bush in my camp.
I suspect if there were evidence he would be the first to endorse it, not to say that none exists. Maybe Dubya needs to contact you and get the conclusive evidence that so far he says doesn’t exist.