[MNJohnnie]

Paul's foreign policy views are based on traditional non-interventionalism, you know, the foreign policy we had up until the 1960s.

You Paulties better stop drinking the Kool Aid and try reading some history. The Spanish American War, the Philippines Insurrection, World War I, the Bananna Wars, World War 2, the Korean War and a whole bunch of other armed interventions prove your contention completely without any intellectual merit.

[NCSteve]

You Paulties better stop drinking the Kool Aid...

That's a laugh, bushbot. Wait, I forgot, do you prefer the purple or the green?

While the Spanish-American War was pure, Jacobin intervention by the father of the neocons, calling WW I and WW II interventionism is stupid. Who knows what you're babbling about with the Banana War reference (I would say you can't possibly be talking about the mafia war, but with you, who knows?) and the Phillipine Insurrection was action against insurgents in a US possession.

Do you even have a clue what interventionism is? Maybe you should spend some time brushing up on your political science before you post any more of your drivel.