Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Morgan in Denver

I agree. In any other year, Jeb Bush would be a logical choice, but he won’t stand a chance. Maybe Owens of CO?


58 posted on 05/19/2007 9:18:29 AM PDT by LS (CNN is the Amtrak of News)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]


To: LS

Nope, Owens burned his bridges to the ground here I’m afraid. Huckabee or Gilmore, who knows. I suspect Fred would want two things supplementing his abilities. One to deliver a state and secondly to shore up the lack of executive experience. That is, IF he’s the nominee.

Romney has the reverse problem in that he would need some help attracting southern voters and someone who would shore up any perceived lack of conservative credentials.

Still, Fred Thompson may be the smartest candidate by avoiding the stampede that we are seeing now. He can campaign without being official so he’s not in the competition in the same way.

IF this becomes Clinton v Thompson it will be the first election pitching US Senators in a long while, and every president since Kennedy has been either a current or past VP, or a governor of a state.


61 posted on 05/19/2007 9:33:27 AM PDT by Morgan in Denver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson