Or how he stepped into a “mess” that resulted in no criminal convictions, and was prompted by a anonymous letter placed on a reporter’s desk (Olympics). Mitt came in as a figurehead, perhaps already selected by the powers that be in Utah, to “rescue” America. I for one don’t buy it.
I don’t know if America is ready to put their trust in a slick investment officer, with a propensity to irrational thinking.
You might be able to back Romney, but the big question is, can America? I can’t. But we know what dog I have in the fight....you can, and you too have your favorite dog. But now we need to be thinking of vetting a man for POTUS. Mitt has waaayyy too much baggage IMHO to secure a win for our side.
What is more irrational: Adhering to a set of moral principles and encouraging others to do the same, however mistaken some may believe those principles to be, or devoting hours upon hours on the computer tearing down the beliefs of others based on beliefs that themselves may be in error?