Does Planned Parenthood really want their records subpoenaed in a civil lawsuit? They are baby killers. Are they also stupid baby killers?
We will be waiting for that interview! This is a brave woman, and I pray this will get a lot of coverage.
Heard about this on Glenn Beck. I love that kids like this exist in this nation.
There is no way she can be sucessfully sued for video or audio taping an organization or agency which takes taxpayers money. There is no ‘privacy’ issue when given illegal advice.
I suppose it does not matter now.
I knew a young woman who once went to Planned Parenthood for a pregnancy test. She was a nice girl but not terribly smart or world-wise. When the PP “advisor” came back into the room with the results, she began asking Linda some questions.
“What are you going to do if the results come back positive?”
“Have you thought about how difficult it will be for you to raise a baby?”
“Do you really want to have a baby when you’re single and not able to afford one?”
After other such leading questions, Linda got mad and yelled “If I’m pregnant, I’m going to keep the baby. Now, give me the damn results!”
The results were negative.
So why, if the “advisor” knew the results were negative, did she continue to pepper Linda with what-if questions as if the results were positive?
To sell her an abortion she didn’t need, of course. When I told her this, her eyes got as big as saucers. She had no idea how close she came to getting conned.
Interview with Lila Rose — http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1835588/posts
OK, here’s the part I don’t get. If an activity is ILLEGAL, what should it matter how the authorities find out about it?
“According to the letter, which LifeNews.com obtained, Wagle claims the videos were made “through false pretenses and unlawfully” and that the conversations they contain “were surreptitiously recorded without the knowledge and consent of PPLA employees.””
Tell that to Newt Gingrich, who had his cell phone conference call conversations taped “accidentally” in 1996 by a couple in Florida (Alice and John Martin, of Fort White, FL), who gave it to their gave the tape to Florida Congresswoman Karen Thurman, who later gave it back to the Martins and recommended they give it to Congressman Jim McDermott, the ranking Democrat on the Ethics Committee investigating Gingrich.
Two days later the contents of the tape were on the front page of the “New York Times.” NOTE: Federal law (the Electronic Communications Privacy Act) prohibits intentionally intercepting telephone calls or intentionally disclosing their contents. After the damage was done, McDermott recused himself from the Ethics Committee. Wotta guy!! /sarcasm
The sainted Martins (who, coincidentally, are active in Florida DEMACRATIC politics) eventually pleaded guilty and were fined a “whopping” $500 each. However, the court ruled that McDermott’s leaking of the call’s contents to the press is protected by freedom of speech. Because the recordings were a matter of “important public interest,” (how this conversation was a matter of “important public interest” is a bit questionable) the First Amendment trumped the privacy rights of the call’s participants. Those who staunchly defend “privacy rights” and condemn Linda Tripp for taping her own conversations to protect herself are strangely silent about releasing the contents of an illegally recorded cell-phone conversation.
Notice the trend here? (for an interesting recount of the event, see www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/congress/january97/cellular_1-14.html)
Where was Newt’s expectation of privacy?
I think that these recordings, which shed light on the highly illegal and immoral aspects of the loathsome abortion enthusiasts like PP are definitely in “the public interest” and should be given the same wristslap treatment the Martins got.
Naturally, the Democrats will do no such thing, because laws are only written to punish non liberals.