Personal attacks do not make the case for ID. You'll have to come up with real arguments in favor of it first. Arguments that hold water, of course.
being scammed by Darwinian cultists ...
I never understood why accusing biologists of being members of a cult was seen as an argument in favor of ID. At best, you are saying that evolutionary biology and ID are equivalent faith systems. So what now? I flip a coin and determine which is better? Of course one would have to add coin tosses for all the other creation myths as well.
Personally, I prefer science to ancient creation stories.
What a hypocrite you are. Here’s your opening salvo:
==”The lame attempts to debunk the fundamental principles of evolution are about on par with holocaust denial.
In case you haven’t noticed, I’m not interested in making the case for ID to you. You have already proven that you are dishonest, hit below the belt, and can’t be bothered with facts or reason.
==Personally, I prefer science to ancient creation stories.
No, you prefer to be an evangelist for the latest creation myth promulgated by the Church of Darwin.
==I wouldn’t give David Duke tenure either.
Why not? David Duke is one of yours: