Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Capt. Cox
But anyway, McCain is wrong. The question from Brit Hume presupposed that the terrorist knew about the nuclear weapons and asked if the candidate would authorize waterboarding of that one man in order to save the life of millions. Is there even a dilemma here? I don’t think so.

I just reviewed the recording since I didn't recall it as you describe. I was correct.

Hume posited a situation where three malls had been terror-bombed with hundreds dead, thousands wounded and with a fourth terrorist team intercepted off Florida and in custody. And intelligence believes "another larger attack is planned and could come at any time".

No mention of nukes. Zero.
33 posted on 05/17/2007 2:29:44 PM PDT by George W. Bush
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: George W. Bush

“No mention of nukes. Zero.”

ok. Tancredo answered with something along the lines that he would call jack bauer to find the nukes so I assumed nukes was in the question. It doesn’t change anything.

I don’t get your point here. Are you saying the the terrorist apprehended should be entitled to due process, lawyers, etc.. while another terrorist attack is in the works?


37 posted on 05/17/2007 2:53:44 PM PDT by Capt. Cox (evangelicalsformitt.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson