Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: jmc813

I don’t care who owns it. It’s disseminating conservative opinion, an even-handed news presentation, and strong investigatory journalism; it actively opposes the machinery of the Left, including the New York Times and the Washington Post. Whatever his motivations I’m glad that Moon supports it. Since he apparently demands no editorial concessions in return for his ownership, what’s the harm? It’s great that while the other dinosaur newspapers are going under, the Times continues to publish from a conservative stance.


11 posted on 05/17/2007 6:47:49 AM PDT by Fairview ( Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Fairview
Whatever his motivations I’m glad that Moon supports it. Since he apparently demands no editorial concessions in return for his ownership, what’s the harm?

The harm is that every time you purchase a copy, you are contributing to his criminal enterprise. You might as well buy flowers from a brainwashed kid on the streets.

As far as "no editorial concessions" goes, check out the text of a full-page ad the Times ran. Keep in mind that this a link right to the Moonie website and not a critical site.

12 posted on 05/17/2007 7:09:55 AM PDT by jmc813 (The 2nd Amendment is NOT a "social conservative" issue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson