Skip to comments.
No Consensus on Global Warming (The earth is warming – but we’re not at fault.)
TheCarConnection.com ^
| May 15, 2007
| Gary Witzenburg
Posted on 05/17/2007 2:09:14 AM PDT by Las Vegas Dave
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
To: Las Vegas Dave
Global warming fanatics hearken back to the Marxists who believed that their predictions of the future were scientific and therefore could not be questioned.
To: neverdem; bd476; NautiNurse; Howlin; Gabz; SamAdams76; SunkenCiv; JockoManning; BurbankKarl; ...
For those interested in the global warming farce...(Please ping those who you think may be interested in this.)
3
posted on
05/17/2007 2:23:29 AM PDT
by
Las Vegas Dave
(HDTV ping list, please FReepmail me if you would like your name added.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Just remember, if there is a lawyer or a politician involved (usually one in the same) you are dealing with a certified self severing idiot!
4
posted on
05/17/2007 2:24:09 AM PDT
by
Herakles
(Diversity is code word for anti-white racism)
To: Las Vegas Dave
GW Theory is remarkably robust with respect to data. All observations confirm with it probability 1.0.
To: Las Vegas Dave
6
posted on
05/17/2007 2:41:12 AM PDT
by
JoeGar
To: DaveLoneRanger; texianyankee; JayB; ElkGroveDan; markman46; palmer; Bahbah; Paradox; FOG724; ...
DOOMAGE!
Global Warming PING!
You have been pinged because of your interest in environmentalism, alarmist wackos, mainstream media doomsday hype, and other issues pertaining to global warming.
Freep-mail DaveLoneRanger to get on or off: Add me / Remove me
Please ping me to all note-worthy threads on global warming.
To: Las Vegas Dave
What seems difficult for non-scientific GWFs and GW believers to grasp is that two things happening simultaneously - increasing CO2 and increasing temperatures - are not necessarily linked. Is increasing human life expectancy caused by increasing CO2?
Liberal's thrive on simplistic science.
If A is followed by B, then obviously A caused B to happen.
There is no sense even trying to get through to these cement heads. There infantile minds are already made up.
Data and facts give them headaches.
8
posted on
05/17/2007 2:56:46 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Bookmarking bumpers.
Thanks for posting!
prisoner6
9
posted on
05/17/2007 3:21:52 AM PDT
by
prisoner6
(Right Wing Nuts hold the country together as the loose screws of the Left fall out.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
Thermal engineers use a lot of empirically-derived constants in calculating heat transfer of systems. So, the heat conducted by .038 percent of any gas in an open system statistically disappears in the noise of known errors. Especially a global scale with varying water-evaporation rates, CO2 is just not a factor.
It's hard to believe acceptance of this makes one a political malcontent.
10
posted on
05/17/2007 3:26:49 AM PDT
by
Thrownatbirth
(.....when the sidewalks are safe for the little guy.)
To: Las Vegas Dave; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; ...
Cap'n Obvious Rides Again...
11
posted on
05/17/2007 3:28:33 AM PDT
by
xcamel
(Press to Test, Release to Detonate)
To: sneakers
proud-to-be-a-global-warming denier bump!
12
posted on
05/17/2007 3:28:35 AM PDT
by
sneakers
To: HEY4QDEMS
One study posted here before showed that warming preceded co2 increase.
13
posted on
05/17/2007 3:33:11 AM PDT
by
orchid
(Defeat is worse than death, you have to LIVE with defeat.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
14
posted on
05/17/2007 3:42:47 AM PDT
by
jsh3180
To: Las Vegas Dave; AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fedora; ...
The oft-touted U.N. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) "consensus of 2000 scientists" is a politically driven scam.
Thanks LVD.
15
posted on
05/17/2007 4:59:11 AM PDT
by
SunkenCiv
(Time heals all wounds, particularly when they're not yours. Profile updated May 11, 2007.)
To: Las Vegas Dave
16
posted on
05/17/2007 5:27:47 AM PDT
by
Eagles6
(Dig deeper, more ammo.)
To: orchid
One study posted here before showed that warming preceded co2 increase.
It doesn't reaaly matter, my point is that IMO and in the opinion of many others, CO2 and GW have nothing to do with each other but the lefties already have there minds made up that it does. So to them the connection is gospel.
17
posted on
05/17/2007 5:35:20 AM PDT
by
HEY4QDEMS
(Sarchasm: The gulf between the author of sarcastic wit and the person who doesn't get it.)
To: jsh3180
Those are the 2 best weblogs on climate that I am aware of. Everyone who reads FreeRepublic should be reading those blogs as well (if they are truly interested in GW debate). (Of course, realclimate.org should be visited from time to time just to see how childish people can act).
To: AaronInCarolina
“Those are the 2 best weblogs on climate that I am aware of.”
I have been forwarding these and other info to Art Bell of Kook to Kook.
He has jumped the shark and joined the man made global warming nuts.
At least his weekday host, Norey, seems to still have not
lost his mind.
I doubt that I will get any reply from Bell.
19
posted on
05/17/2007 8:37:42 AM PDT
by
AlexW
(Reporting from Bratislava, Slovakia)
To: Las Vegas Dave
CO2 is not a pollutant; it’s plant food.
20
posted on
05/17/2007 9:28:39 AM PDT
by
xjcsa
(In memoriam...Jerry Falwell, August 11, 1933 - May 15, 2007. Enter into your eternal inheritance.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-30 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson