[soccermom]

First of all, he wasn’t stating “facts” — he was stating his opinion that U.S. involvement in the middle east was the cause of the 9/11 attacks. My problem is not that Paul looks to Bin Laden’s words to explain why we were attacked, but that he is following Bin Laden’s prescription for making terror attacks effective.

[billbears]

First of all, he wasn’t stating “facts” — he was stating his opinion that U.S. involvement in the middle east was the cause of the 9/11 attacks.

So the 9/11 Commission Report isn't fact? Interesting, I thought I read it, I guess I didn't....and I guess Al Qaeda's reasons given in 1996 for declaring war on the US didn't happen either...Hmmmm, and read that right even here on this site as it was posted several times

Thank you for clarifying the Republican party is dismissing so much written word (some of it by our own government) to get the 'message' out.

but that he is following Bin Laden’s prescription for making terror attacks effective.

What because he refused to answer a question based on next season's 24?