Does Johnson have the capacity to decide anything at this point?
Is that not a fair question to ask?
Given the massive fraud of the rats in every election, Tim Johnson was likely defeated by thousands of votes.
Another Johnson (Lyndon Baines) used to delight in telling the story of rebuking a staffer who was collecting “ghost voter” names in a cemetery, who complained that he could not read the eroded name on a tombstone, “you go back and get that name, he has as much right to vote as anyone else in this cemetery” (David Brinkley).
Rats are Rats, they are implacable—they cannot be reasoned with; just as the islamists cannot be reasoned with—they are destroying America, committed to the goal.
Is that not a fair question to ask?
IMHO it would seem fair to ask the question of whether he can decide to run for reelection or not. Or at least set a timetable for making that decision . . .And at some point it will become fair to ask if he can debate his Republican challenger. If not, then the situation becomes a reprise of the election of the widow Carnahan in MO back in 2000 . . . a Senator elected on a sympathy vote.
You could easily ask that of most of the Congressmen and Senators.