Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RussP; Alamo-Girl
Naturalism as a hypothesis is fine, but as a premise it is nothing more than a dogma.

Excellent insight, RussP! IMHO You really hit the bull's-eye here....

Thank you so very much!

32 posted on 05/19/2007 10:03:27 AM PDT by betty boop ("Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind." -- A. Einstein.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]


To: betty boop

Well, thanks. I certainly appreciate your insights too.

Most hard-core evolutionists don’t understand the difference between a hypothesis and a premise. Then they have the hubris to claim that “philosophy” is obsolete when if fact they simply fail to understand its most basic principles.


35 posted on 05/19/2007 11:02:29 AM PDT by RussP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson