Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Digital singles thriving where 45s once ruled
Houston Chronicle, AP Wire ^ | May 15, 2007 | NEKESA MUMBI MOODY

Posted on 05/16/2007 5:23:55 AM PDT by urtax$@work

Digital singles thriving where 45s once ruled Music industry pays price for expecting fans to buy $15 CDs......... NEW YORK — It sounds like a horror movie: a beloved friend is callously exterminated, then reincarnated in a different form to wreak havoc on the killer.

That's the nightmare currently facing the music industry.

Almost a decade after virtually eliminating 45s and cassette singles, thereby forcing fans to spend more money on whole albums, the digital single is largely responsible for the industry's woes.

(Excerpt) Read more at chron.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: downloads; mp3; music; riaa
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last
And i thought it was illegal downloads...
1 posted on 05/16/2007 5:23:58 AM PDT by urtax$@work
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

“That’s the nightmare currently facing the music industry.”

The nightmare that is currently facing the music industry is most of the music sucks! We are so desperate to find something worth listening to we flock to by even a mediocre Nora Jones CD.


2 posted on 05/16/2007 5:27:52 AM PDT by poobear (Capitalism is judged by its flaws and worst examples, Socialism by promises and good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work
Well, now you can't charge 19 bucks for eight pieces of crap so we can listen to one decent song.

I remember once trying to buy a 45 that was at the time a #1 hit according to Billboard, but they stopped printing it. At the time, I didn't buy too many albums that I hadn't heard before, so I never got the song. Which is probably okay, because I can't even remember what the song was.

3 posted on 05/16/2007 5:28:57 AM PDT by Tanniker Smith (I didn't know she was a Liberal when I married her.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear
The big labels are in a shambles. It's very difficult to rise to the top in the music biz anymore.

Shameless artist plug: http://www.myspace.com/marenmorris

4 posted on 05/16/2007 5:34:09 AM PDT by manic4organic (Send a care package through USO today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

Digital singles? I thought maybe this was some sort of kinky dating thread.


5 posted on 05/16/2007 5:35:15 AM PDT by Larry Lucido (Duncan Hunter 2008 (or Fred Thompson if he ever makes up his mind))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; chance33_98; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; PenguinWry; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; ..

6 posted on 05/16/2007 5:42:37 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Tanniker Smith
Which is probably okay, because I can't even remember what the song was.

Probably something by Gary Lewis and the Playboys...

7 posted on 05/16/2007 5:44:45 AM PDT by ErnBatavia (...forward this to your 10 very best friends....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

this reply contains an excerpt of above article for discussion purposes:

Consumers no longer need to buy an album if they want that cool jam they heard on the radio — and in growing numbers, they’re choosing 99-cent downloads over $15 CDs.

Some worry this trend is worsening the quality of albums as a cohesive musical work, and that label executives are more and more interested in quick hits than lasting music or artists.

While the vast majority of music consumers still buy CD albums, they are buying less of them, while digital tracks are exploding: According to Nielsen SoundScan, sales of physical CDs this year have declined 20 percent from the same point in 2006, from 112 million to 89 million. Digital tracks are up to 288 million from 242 million at the same period last year. And that’s not counting the millions of singles that are illegally downloaded.

“Now, we’re in a very difference place in terms of the single business,” Jim Donio, president of National Association of Recording Merchandisers, said in an interview. “The single business is alive and well, and it’s in the form of track downloads.”

The same cannot be said, however, for albums. Even counting albums that are downloaded along with physical CDs sold, album sales are down 10 percent from the same period last year, according to Nielsen SoundScan, continuing a decline that has been growing for several years.

The industry’s hard times are evident in recent label consolidations, widespread layoffs, reduction in budgets and an overall air of belt-tightening.

In 1996, music companies shipped more than 1.1 billion units — all physical product — for a value of $12.5 billion, according to the Recording Industry Association of America. Ten years later, despite a decline in physical product sold, they industry has “shipped” approximately 1.6 billion units — but its value is down by a billion dollars, to $11.5 billion.


8 posted on 05/16/2007 5:48:01 AM PDT by urtax$@work (we have faced tenacity before....& The Best kind of Memorial is a BURNING Memorial)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: poobear

by = buy

geez


9 posted on 05/16/2007 5:53:52 AM PDT by poobear (Capitalism is judged by its flaws and worst examples, Socialism by promises and good intentions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work
I think the record labels are going to be pushing for some very hard DRM (digital rights management) to fight this. Do you want to buy a single for your iPod? $0.99. Do you want to listen to it on your computer? $0.99 more. Download it to your cell phone? another $0.99. Switched computers and need your song again? cha-ching! $0.99 again.
10 posted on 05/16/2007 6:08:37 AM PDT by KarlInOhio (Parker v. DC: the best court decision of the year.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work
Some worry this trend is worsening the quality of albums as a cohesive musical work, and that label executives are more and more interested in quick hits than lasting music or artists.

Oh please.

11 posted on 05/16/2007 6:11:51 AM PDT by Steely Tom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

I remember David Lee Roth made an album once with only four songs. People complained about the short album, but he said that most albums are a few good songs plus several crappy filler songs, and he just left out the crap.

Very true. I can only think of a few exceptions to this rule.


12 posted on 05/16/2007 6:14:20 AM PDT by antiRepublicrat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

The new music released today just sucks. I heard a brand new release from Elton John and one from Paul McCartney. They are both simply awful. The only reason those two releases got played was because of John’s and McCartney’s previous work.


13 posted on 05/16/2007 6:16:47 AM PDT by caver (Yes, I did crawl out of a hole in the ground.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work
“... worsening the quality of albums as a cohesive musical work.”

I can’t remember the last album I bought that remotely resembled a “cohesive musical work” - maybe “Synchronicity” by the Police?

14 posted on 05/16/2007 6:17:04 AM PDT by riverdawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

Limewire.


15 posted on 05/16/2007 6:17:58 AM PDT by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg
I can’t remember the last album I bought that remotely resembled a “cohesive musical work” - maybe “Synchronicity” by the Police?

The Wall

16 posted on 05/16/2007 6:18:12 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work
Some worry this trend is worsening the quality of albums as a cohesive musical work, and that label executives are more and more interested in quick hits than lasting music or artists.

Chicken or the egg bump

17 posted on 05/16/2007 6:23:04 AM PDT by BlueMondaySkipper (The quickest way of ending a war is to lose it. - George Orwell)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: urtax$@work

Well, call me crazy, but I would have missed some of my favourite tunes if I had only ever listened to the radio and bought singles. In fact, many of my favourite songs, which I never heard on the radio or anywhere else, only became my favourites after several listenings of a full CD that I bought.


18 posted on 05/16/2007 6:23:27 AM PDT by -YYZ-
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: riverdawg

Siamese Dream


19 posted on 05/16/2007 6:41:42 AM PDT by az_illini (Why? Why? Why are there no flying cars? We were promised flying cars.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Larry Lucido

I thought it was like, an AARP dating thread for cool, computer-savvy people over 45. Never mind. Now where did I set my Metamucil?

lol

P.S. I still have a turntable. Scary.


20 posted on 05/16/2007 6:42:04 AM PDT by GnuHere
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson