Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: familyop
"BTW, in the Russian configuration, that missile had much more range. The North Koreans adapted them to carry heavier payloads."

I'd bet that's because the NorK and Iranian warhead designs are not as lightweight as the Russian ones. It takes a lot of development to get from a nuke that works to one that is light enough to package on a missile. Look at the size of Little Boy and Fat Man versus modern warheads.
46 posted on 05/16/2007 7:10:57 PM PDT by omnivore
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]


To: omnivore; familyop; AmericanInTokyo
"BTW, in the Russian configuration, that missile had much more range. The North Koreans adapted them to carry heavier payloads."

Interesting... the last time I spoke with my Iranian and Pakistani sources I was told that Iran has already completed a total of six "uranium bombs" ~ when I refered to them as nukes, the Pakistani smiled and corrected me and once again said they were "uranium bombs".

The problem I was told was that these "uranium bombs" were too heavy.

53 posted on 05/25/2007 5:15:17 AM PDT by expatguy (http://laotze.blogspot.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson