Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: EternalVigilance

What part of the following do you not understand?

Here are just some of the points that the media (including The Boston Globe) got wrong.

Myth: Some headlines claimed that the legislature voted to expand the ban on the sale of the same 19 guns that the federal government has banned.

Fact: The guns are already banned in Massachusetts . The legislature only voted to clarify the definition of so-called “assault weapons,” but made no changes to the number of guns included.

Myth: The gun ban was extended.

Fact: Our state`s gun ban was not due to disappear, nor will it become invalid if the federal ban sunsets in September.

Myth: The legislature somehow “won over” gun-rights supporters by including reforms.

Fact: NRA and Gun owners` Action League (GOAL) had made it very clear to the legislature that we would not give up any ground. NRA and GOAL supported this bill because it did not ban any guns, and because it made much-needed reforms.

Myth: Those legislators that wanted to expand the semi-auto gun ban claimed that they “spearheaded” S.2367.

Fact: Credit should be given to Senator Stephen Brewer (D- Barre) and Senator Richard T. Moore (D - Uxbridge) for the reform language.

Myth: The Massachusetts House approved a new version of the ban that would decouple the state definitions from the federal ones.

Fact: The bill merely takes the existing state references to federal law, and fixes the language to a point in time in 1994. Because that is the federal language is currently in effect, the net effect on Massachusetts gun owners is zero. No new gun bans are banned. Keep in mind that the state language in effect before this bill was NEVER set to expire.


2,499 posted on 05/15/2007 9:25:14 PM PDT by claudiustg (I curse you, Rudy of the Giuliani!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2473 | View Replies ]


To: claudiustg

What part of Mitt Romney’s comment tonight in support of an assault weapons ban do you fail to grasp?


2,510 posted on 05/15/2007 9:27:40 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (It wasn't a debate. It was a mass interview....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2499 | View Replies ]

To: claudiustg; All
No matter how hard Romney's spinners try to change the subject, it is painfully clear that Mitt Romney himself thought he was banning "scary" guns as Governor. His own comments when he signed the bill prove it:

"Deadly assault weapons have no place in Massachusetts. These guns are not made for recreation or self-defense. They are instruments of destruction with the sole purpose of hunting down and killing people."

His comments tonight reaffirmed his stance:

"Well, let’s get the record straight. There’s no question I support Second Amendment rights, but I also support an assault weapon ban."

2,557 posted on 05/15/2007 9:43:02 PM PDT by EternalVigilance (It wasn't a debate. It was a mass interview....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2499 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson