To: JerseyDvl; billbears
Paul is saying now on Fox to that blowhard Hannity what he should have said to Giuliani.
2,255 posted on
05/15/2007 8:42:16 PM PDT by
LibertarianInExile
(If ‘He can win,’ is your first defense, obviously, that’s his one plus--not his conservatism.)
To: LibertarianInExile
Just for the record mister, I don’t agree with Ron Paul on the conclusions he makes on the Mideast, but I'm happy that he was in the debates, and I thank you for speaking your mind here.
To: LibertarianInExile
Poor ol' Sean about lost it. And he clearly stated the new 'conservative' position. Intervention into other nations whose tyrant may be mistreating his people. Forget threat, we're supposed to be the world's policeman. And people wonder why Republicans are losing votes. Guess Sean will be getting a group up to go into Africa to fix all those problems? Wonder if he'll lead it or just stay back here and be a commentator....
2,308 posted on
05/15/2007 8:48:37 PM PDT by
billbears
(Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it. --Santayana)
To: LibertarianInExile
Sean said (to RP) that it's America's moral obligation to intervene militarily anywhere in the world where atrocities are taking place. ....essentially saying that it's our obligation to police the entire world at all times.
While I strongly disagree with RP's prescription for Iraq (and his take on the WOT in general), Hannity's nation-building / police action ideas are pure madness.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson