To: Islander7
"California-Sized Area of Ice Melts in Antarctica"
Also in the article it said it was snow and not ice that melted and then promptly froze back. The difference?
No net lose of water to rise the oceans levels.
Just how many times do ya think this has happened over the years and nobody to notice it?
25 posted on
05/15/2007 4:17:54 PM PDT by
RedMonqey
( The truth is never PC)
To: RedMonqey
Also in the article it said it was snow and not ice that melted and then promptly froze back. The difference? No net lose of water to rise the oceans levels.
No. It depends where it originally melted and subsequently refrozen.
49 posted on
05/15/2007 7:02:46 PM PDT by
burzum
(None shall see me, though my battlecry may give me away -Minsc)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson