To: napscoordinator
IN time of conflict, why not simply change the Sec Def to Sec War?
14 posted on
05/15/2007 2:14:15 PM PDT by
sono
(TITVS PVLLO in MMVIII - Paid for by the Aventine Collegium for Pullo)
To: sono
That’s too “aggressive” sounding (we sacked the Secretary of War in 1947) for our oh-so-delicate liberal friends. Remember, Denny “Spock” Kucinich wants to create a Secretary of Peas.
18 posted on
05/15/2007 2:19:34 PM PDT by
fieldmarshaldj
(Would you vote for President a guy who married his cousin? Me, neither. Accept no RINOs. Fred in '08)
To: sono
IN time of conflict, why not simply change the Sec Def to Sec War?When the Department of War was abolished in 1947, we were out of the war business. We still are.
26 posted on
05/15/2007 2:32:29 PM PDT by
Jim Noble
(We don't need to know what Cho thought. We need to know what Librescu thought.)
To: sono
That is a really good point!!!
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson