Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: voletti

If U.S employers can’t use H-1 visas to bring qualified workers to the U.S., they will outsource the job to India. Which is better — having the job in the U.S. filled by a foreign worker, or having the job in a foreign country filled by a foreign worker. That is the choice. I would prefer the former.


5 posted on 05/15/2007 6:53:10 AM PDT by AConnecticutYankee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: AConnecticutYankee
having the job in the U.S. filled by a foreign worker, or having the job in a foreign country filled by a foreign worker. That is the choice. I would prefer the former.

That's not much of a choice. If was was one of those two, I'd prefer the latter, and this is why:

Either way the American worker is out of a job. He loses in both cases. However, if the job is here, the company pays taxes and supports the decision to go with H1-B. Move that job out of country, and the state and federal government loses out on any taxes that job brings in. Lose enough of those jobs and the gov't starts looking harder at its own policies and will bring those jobs back--to American workers.

7 posted on 05/15/2007 6:58:27 AM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

To: AConnecticutYankee
Let’em send the job overseas. But make sure that the tariffs and taxes are always enough to make it cheaper to buy a similar product or service from an AMERICAN company.
14 posted on 06/19/2007 2:18:00 PM PDT by RedStateRocker (Nuke Mecca, Deport all illegals, abolish the IRS, ATF and DEA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson