Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: kabar
Oh yeah, I agree we neither want nor need even a 1980s size force. But remember, the original point was about NATO struggling to find a 2500 person force to send to Afghanistan! I would suggest that despite our over whelming technological edge over every possible combination of foes, when we cannot come up with even a single brigade on short notice to deploy we have a serious manpower issue that needs to be addressed!
280 posted on 05/13/2007 11:13:36 AM PDT by MNJohnnie (If you will try being smarter, I will try being nicer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 278 | View Replies ]


To: MNJohnnie
I agree we need to restructure our forces to meet future threats. I doubt we will get much help from Europe, which is falling further and further behind us in terms of interoperability between our forces. The US is the lone military power that can project its forces worldwide.

NATO is becoming more of a political alliance than a military alliance. It is the US and a bunch of midgets. Canada, a nation of 33 million, spends 1.1% of its GDP on defense and has about 65,000 personnel in its armed forces.

287 posted on 05/13/2007 11:51:29 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

To: MNJohnnie

Vast understatement here.


294 posted on 05/13/2007 12:25:56 PM PDT by rodguy911 (Support The New media, Ticket the Drive-bys, --America-The land of the Free because of the Brave-)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 280 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson