Time for reality for you
***And, uh, what color is the sky on the planet you’re from?
I’m NOT a Rudy supporter
***I’ve heard that one before, with the same level of vehemence and invective; turned out not to be true.
You, however, are doing the bidding of the Hillary/Obama/Satan supporters.
***I would respectfully ask you to take back that Satan thing. As a believer in Jesus Christ, I find it extremely offensive. If you think I am doing the bidding of Hillary/Obama, then take that up with the owner of Free Republic who is actively Swift-boating Giuliani. Are you going to do that? Or are you going to waste your time with us 2nd tier freepers in your quest for a freepercide?
Here’s some threads for you to go to that discuss exactly the same stuff, and the thread owner is Jim Robinson.
Giuliani’s Direct Talk: “I’ve always believed in [abortion] and always will.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1832616/posts
Giuliani clarifies his stand on abortion, gays and guns: abortion one of his “core beliefs.”
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1832412/posts
The Giuliani Truth File - Rudy: In his own words and deeds.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=GiulianiTruthFile
Stop trashing Republicans until you’ve defeated the Dhimmicrats
***Why? Is this a GOP website? NO! Have I been signing my name in blood for 9 years to support conservatism only to find out that conservatism never really existed, that this community was owned by faux conservative CINOs all along?
Don’t do their dirty work
***So, pointing out that some candidate is a liberal — even when it turns out later that the candidate self-admits he’s a liberal — that’s doing the demorats’ dirty work? Since when? If someone came onto this forum to support a liberal democrat, they’d be removed in a heartbeat. But just because this liberal has an R in front of his name, it’s somehow dirty work to point out the same things?
Support your Republican candidate. I support you 100%, even if I don’t support that candidate.
***Oh, good.
Trash a potential Republican nominee to the benefit of the Dhimmicrats, no matter how much you may prefer another Republican, and you are my eternal enemy.
***Then I have some advice for you: Quit Free Republic. This ain’t the place for you because this ain’t a GOP website. It’s a conservative one, and that ridiculous lipstick-on-a-pig RINO candidate is going to get trashed, even by the owner of this site. That makes JimRob your eternal enemy. So I guess this means “Good Bye”.
Is that clear enough for everyone?
***Clear enough to qualify as an opus. Not a very good one, though.
I will support anyone in the Republican field over any Dhimmicrat. If anyone says otherwise they are the enemy of HUMANITY.
***Great exaggerations. They don’t amount to a hill of beans, though. All just a tale full of sound & fury, signifying nothing.
How’s that?
***See ya.
You are obviously more interested in defeating Rudy than defeating the Dhimmicrats.
My agenda is 100% the opposite. I want to defeat the Dhimmicrats, whom I have decided are serving the interests of Satan.
You dismiss that and want to defeat Rudy, even if it means the servants of Satan win.
Therefore you are serving the interests of Satan
If that offends you then maybe you will take a moment to review your priorities.
Defeat Rudy in the primaries. Well and good and I will support that... in favor of a better conservative. Again, my candidate it Fred.
Continue to obsess on defeating Rudy, even if it means putting Hillary or someone of her ilk in power and It is clear whose interests you serve
I don’t support Rudy. You apparently do support Hillary in place of Rudy. You are on the wrong side of history.
You are on the wrong side of right and wrong, for that matter.
There is no other question, so far as I am concerned.
THEY must not win. ANY of the Republican candidates is preferably to them (Hagel is NOT a Republican candidate, before you bring that up).
Don’t serve them. That is all I ask.
All of your other arguments are BS, so long as you favor the success of a Dhimmicrat over a legitimate Republican.
End of discussion.
-30-