To: BigTom85
“As far as Iraq goes, we went there with the intention of enforcing ‘umpteen’ (between 15-20) useless and bogus UN resolutions. The US has NO business enforcing UN resolutions. “
We led a multinational alliance against Saddam in the first gulf war. The cease fire was based on Saddam’s compliance of these resolutions. This is preferred over seperate unilateral agreements between the beligerents involved.
To: death2tyrants
We led a multinational alliance against Saddam in the first gulf war. The cease fire was based on Saddams compliance of these resolutions. This is preferred over seperate unilateral agreements between the beligerents involved.
Again, the first resolution is just as irrelevant as the last one that the UN created. The UN is a joke. It's useless. It has no international authority. We have no business enforcing their weightless 'resolutions'. The UN resolutions bear less weight than the actual sheets of paper that they are printed on.
Saddam was a class A sc*mbag to the highest degree- we will all agree on that. However, if we are going to go to war with him, we should do it with the intent of defending the US- not enforcing the UN resolutions.
You sent me a response earlier citing a few UN resolutions as if they were gospel... your above post to me was nonsense. You asked if I wanted to debate you.. and I did. However, I think this debate is pretty much over. Have a good night.
168 posted on
05/11/2007 9:02:18 PM PDT by
BigTom85
(Proud Gun Owner and Member of NRA)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson