If would be a lot cheaper if private-professional services were used to rate, report on, and disseminate information on the quality of “services” provided by the health care industry and its practitioners, instead of turning the system of “law”, via “regulation” of everything, into nothing more than a cartel of so-called “legal” services.
It is truly not done to achieve a certain standard of knowledge and expertise, but to protect an investment that the individual “legal” practitioners think they have made and prevent anyone from having competing with them when that competitor might have achieved an equal level of expertise with less “investment” - expertise which should be measured by the results of the skill demonstrated in the product and not the volume, amount or type of personal input used to obtain that skill.
Apparently, the “denturist” did not have a single dis-satisfied customer - a record I imagine 100% of the “licensed” dentists in his area could not claim.
I think we do use private inspectors in some fields but I have no doubt more could be done.
One unlicensed guy without complaints doesn’t mean you do away with medical qualifications.