Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Washington State: Kids could be stuck in booster seats until 16
The Everett Herald ^ | May 11, 2007 | Scott Pesznecker and Melissa Slager

Posted on 05/11/2007 6:54:57 AM PDT by Stoat

Thousands of Washington children will be forced back into car and booster seats next month when a change to state law takes effect.

On June 1, children will have to stay in the safety seats until they are at least 8 years old or 4 feet, 9 inches tall.

Violators face a $112 ticket.

About half of all children between 6 to 8 years old will be affected by the change, according to safety advocates.

"It's going to be a big challenge for those kids who have been out of the booster seat to get back," said Shawneri Guzman of Snohomish County SAFE KIDS, a nonprofit group that works to prevent childhood injuries.

The change means parents such as Renee Shonko, 44, of Lake Stevens must break the news to their children.

Daughters Lexi, 8, and Karly, 10, aren't exactly thrilled to be going back into booster seats.

"I don't like it," said Karly, who at 4-foot-8 (with shoes on) is taller than most of her classmates. But that's not tall enough for a seat belt to fit her properly.

Currently, children are required to ride in booster seats until they're 6 years old or weigh 60 pounds.

The changes also require children to use booster seats until they are 16 years old if a vehicle's seat belt does not properly fit the child.

Another change requires children younger than 13 to ride in the back seat whenever possible. They're allowed to ride in the front only if the vehicle has no lap-and-shoulder belts in the back seat.


 

(Excerpt) Read more at heraldnet.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: automotive; booster; boosterseat; cars; driving; kids; nannystate; nocrimeinwashington; safetynazis; stupidity; washington
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-270 next last
To: Sue Perkick

But I know, I’d rather see


81 posted on 05/11/2007 7:47:04 AM PDT by null and void (The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Than be one!


82 posted on 05/11/2007 7:49:11 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 81 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

“I remember standing in the front seat of a vehicle with a metal dash!”

And don’t forget yelling “SHOTGUN” for dibs on the front seat.


83 posted on 05/11/2007 7:49:28 AM PDT by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Sue Perkick

*smooch*


84 posted on 05/11/2007 7:50:03 AM PDT by null and void (The truth. It is a beautiful and terrible thing, and should therefore be treated with great caution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 82 | View Replies]

To: null and void

;)


85 posted on 05/11/2007 7:51:22 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

We’ve gone from sleeping on the rear dash of an old Bonneville to putting teenagers in booster seats. I think I’m going to wrap my kids in bubble wrap before I take them to school tomorrow. Might as well get ahead of the curve.


86 posted on 05/11/2007 7:54:41 AM PDT by Terpin (Missing: One very clever and insightful tagline. Reward for safe return!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NavyCanDo

It’s a miracle we survived. :)


87 posted on 05/11/2007 7:54:45 AM PDT by Sue Perkick (And I hope that what I’ve done here today doesn’t force you to have a negative opinion of me….)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]

To: All

I’m wondering if this will require taxi cabs to provide booster seats for eligible children, and to measure or weigh children with a portable scale prior to allowing them in the cab?

If not, why not?

How about trains?

City buses?


88 posted on 05/11/2007 7:56:04 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

89 posted on 05/11/2007 7:58:05 AM PDT by blues_guitarist ( . . . As in the days of Noah!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The law of unintended consequences means that there will be more and more large suv’s sold. You can’t fit more than 2 kids in the back seat with these stupid boosters, and they are not allowed in the front seat, so what is left if you have more than 2 kids? And heaven forbid if you need to take a friend or 2 with you!!!!


90 posted on 05/11/2007 8:00:15 AM PDT by Grammy ("Ms Pelosi is a very difficult person to embarrass." Fred Thompson, 4/11/07)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Why is it, I wonder - that kids have to be bundled up like an astronaut to take a spin in the family car, but hey - put ‘em on a School Bus, and it’s just a bench, no seat belt and a 9 foot metal ceiling.


91 posted on 05/11/2007 8:03:19 AM PDT by Freedom4US
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

The People’s Republic of Washington. If you vote for socialists, don’t be surprised to have socialism imposed on every part of your life.


92 posted on 05/11/2007 8:06:24 AM PDT by DesScorp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Terpin
We’ve gone from sleeping on the rear dash of an old Bonneville to putting teenagers in booster seats. I think I’m going to wrap my kids in bubble wrap before I take them to school tomorrow. Might as well get ahead of the curve.

I remember one of the films in High School Driver's Ed which featured a particularly enthusiastic parent who had a Checker car because it was so safe, and required both of his daughters to wear motorcycle helmets whenever they were in the car (and he did as well).

He honked at people when there was any conceivable chance that they might be a hazard, such as people walking near the road ("they might stumble and fall in front of the car")

The film acknowledged that this was an 'extreme' attitude, and our instructor derided it as being 'a bit silly'.

I'm guessing that such derisive editorializing is no longer permitted in this hideous Orwellian world which is increasingly being run by Safety Nazis.

93 posted on 05/11/2007 8:07:31 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

I AM SO SICK OF ALL THESE !$#@$!@$@#$!@# SAFETY NAZIS!

THANK GOD I grew up in the LAST era to allow the children to run free!


94 posted on 05/11/2007 8:08:16 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Freedom4US
Why is it, I wonder - that kids have to be bundled up like an astronaut to take a spin in the family car, but hey - put ‘em on a School Bus, and it’s just a bench, no seat belt and a 9 foot metal ceiling.

The flaw in your statement is that it is derived from a logical, sane and rational perspective; and as such is not part of the Socialist Safety Nazi Agenda,

95 posted on 05/11/2007 8:10:14 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: kerryusama04

Ah, but what of the places where TINTING is outlawed?

(Perhaps not in your home, but here...)


96 posted on 05/11/2007 8:13:08 AM PDT by the OlLine Rebel (Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Grammy
The law of unintended consequences means that there will be more and more large suv’s sold. You can’t fit more than 2 kids in the back seat with these stupid boosters, and they are not allowed in the front seat, so what is left if you have more than 2 kids? And heaven forbid if you need to take a friend or 2 with you!!!!

You can fit a booster, an infant rear facing seat, and a toddler forward facing seat in the second row of a Suburban or presumably a Tahoe, but you still have to have an SUV to do it! Maybe a towncar would be wide enough, but the gas mileage would be the same.

97 posted on 05/11/2007 8:15:20 AM PDT by kerryusama04 (John 19:31)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: 4yearlurker

One of the school safety officers wrote an editorial in our local paper, answering the question... “What is the safest way for parents to transport their children to school?” The school in question was on a busy road with an awkward intersection that was accident-prone.

The safety officer said the children were statistically safer in the bright-yellow school bus than in Mom’s SUV. MANY parents were outraged. They wanted to shuttle their children to and from school.


98 posted on 05/11/2007 8:15:20 AM PDT by Pan_Yans Wife (Life isn't fair. It's just fairer than death, that's all.--William Goldman)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Stoat

Actually, it might work out well. This girl in the photo is going to be so effing pissed at liberalism when she turns 18, she’ll never vote for Dems.


99 posted on 05/11/2007 8:15:21 AM PDT by GraniteStateConservative (...He had committed no crime against America so I did not bring him here...-- Worst.President.Ever.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DesScorp
The People’s Republic of Washington. If you vote for socialists, don’t be surprised to have socialism imposed on every part of your life.

The few remaining sane folks here have tried for decades to get rid of the Baghdad Jim McDermotts, the Patty "Osama builds nice roads and schools" Murray and a raft of others, but they are kept in office by an increasing number of hysterical, passionate Leftists who have ruined our State.

It's very depressing when things keep getting worse despite all of our efforts (and there are many passionate, activist FReepers in Washington)

It's no fun at all here, let me assure you.  We don't call it The People's Republic of Washington for no reason.

100 posted on 05/11/2007 8:16:25 AM PDT by Stoat (Rice / Coulter 2008: Smart Ladies for a Strong America)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-8081-100101-120 ... 261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson