[supremedoctrine]

There are some “purists” so unyielding and dogmatic it’s as if their ideal candidate for President would either have to be an aborted fetus or Eric Rudolph. As far as I’m concerned all Romney had to say to advance the argument just a little was his insightful remark that if he had changed from pro-life to pro-choice, rather than the other way around, he would never have been questioned about it or challenged over it; it’s not much, but it is one of the ONLY intelligent things that I have heard from ANY candidate so far. And so far, I’m for him. ROMNEY/THOMPSON.

[EternalVigilance]

There are some “purists” so unyielding and dogmatic it’s as if their ideal candidate for President would either have to be an aborted fetus or Eric Rudolph.

Stuff it, jerk.