Skip to comments.
Immigration compromise falters on Hill
AP on Yahoo ^
| 5/10/07
| Julie Hirschfeld Davis - ap
Posted on 05/10/2007 4:52:28 PM PDT by NormsRevenge
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
To: NormsRevenge
Guess we’ve all heard it a million times. We don’t need any new laws. Just enforce the ones we already have.
2
posted on
05/10/2007 4:56:03 PM PDT
by
Jim Robinson
(Our God-given unalienable rights are not open to debate, negotiation or compromise!)
To: Jim Robinson
That would sure be nice— looks like it’ll never happen tho. They’re too intoxicated with cheap labor (Dims AND Reps), at our expense for social services.
I am so tired of this @#$%. Honestly, who speaks for us in Congress? A handful of patriots.
3
posted on
05/10/2007 4:58:32 PM PDT
by
VictoryGal
(Never give up, never surrender!)
To: NormsRevenge
The GOP position has “moved far to the right” since last year, said Sen. Robert Menendez
Hope it has moved far-right.
4
posted on
05/10/2007 4:59:17 PM PDT
by
sheana
To: NormsRevenge
The move is designed to pressure Republicans to cut a deal or risk being blamed adored, loved, and swung back into the majority for undermining one.
5
posted on
05/10/2007 4:59:47 PM PDT
by
kerryusama04
(John 19:31)
To: NormsRevenge
"'We have serious concerns about the workability and fairness of certain elements of the White House plan,' Menendez added."
Any guesses at to whether or not he is talking about the "fairness" as it pertains to the American citizenry?
6
posted on
05/10/2007 5:00:04 PM PDT
by
Texas_Jarhead
("nothing gets figured out if you don't bother to stop and think about it", Thomas Sowell)
To: NormsRevenge
The GOP position has "moved far to the right" since last year, said Sen. Robert Menendez (news, bio, voting record), R-N.J., who has attended the talks. You'd think a news powerhouse like AP would at least get this bozo's party affiliation right.
7
posted on
05/10/2007 5:01:47 PM PDT
by
Menehune56
(Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
To: NormsRevenge
Republicans and Democrats set the stage for a partisan battle next week that could squash any agreement.
Good.
And if they do nothing, that is better than passing that albatross from last session.
Gridlock may turn out to be the best thing for Bush's last 2 years. The worst thing would be his getting his amnesty -- and losing Congress for decades and the WH potentially for as long.
And this conflict is just in the Senate. There is a good possibility that moderate Dems don't want amnesty any more than Republican conservatives do. So even if Senator Reid does get a bill out of the Senate, it could face defeat in the House.
8
posted on
05/10/2007 5:05:26 PM PDT
by
TomGuy
To: NormsRevenge
I think the open borders crowd actually prefers a status quo that maintains a virtually unlimited supply of illegal workers. They’re much more exploitable.
9
posted on
05/10/2007 5:06:46 PM PDT
by
Menehune56
(Oderint Dum Metuant (Let them hate, so long as they fear - Lucius Accius (170 BC - 86 BC)))
To: Menehune56
Teddy Kennedy wanted the amnesty that allowed the Duka brothers into the country as permanent residents. Odds are good he wanted the Duka brothers themselves ~ maybe so their old man would put a new roof on his house or something.
Everything is possible here. Blame must be assigned.
10
posted on
05/10/2007 5:15:09 PM PDT
by
muawiyah
To: NormsRevenge
Publicly, Republicans remained sunny about the prospects of a compromise, reluctant to be seen as obstacles to achieving an item that polls show has broad support. Yeah, sure, broad support. I'm sure most people support the increased security but very few support rewarding illegals. When you lump all the issues together in one poll, it serves to put lipstick on the pig. I'm not sure I can remember the last time the MSM has been trustworthy.
11
posted on
05/10/2007 5:18:59 PM PDT
by
rbg81
(1)
To: NormsRevenge
Absent a bipartisan deal, Democrats would almost certainly be unable to get the 60 votes they would need to overcome GOP opposition and bring up the bill, which was to be considered over the next two weeks Couldn't the Pubs' give them the 60 votes needed for consideration and then slam dunk the Dems during the debate and then on the actual vote?
12
posted on
05/10/2007 5:30:19 PM PDT
by
glorgau
To: NormsRevenge
I’m for immigration reform,enforce the law send’em home!
13
posted on
05/10/2007 5:43:20 PM PDT
by
bonehead4freedom
(Winning the war is easy kill the enemy and don't let the A.C.L.U. dictate the rules of engagement)
To: Texas_Jarhead
“Any guesses at to whether or not he is talking about the “fairness” as it pertains to the American citizenry?”
We only count to pay the bills and reemploy these cretins.
14
posted on
05/10/2007 5:58:53 PM PDT
by
FredHunter08
(Guiliani! Come and Take Them!)
To: NormsRevenge
Publicly, Republicans remained sunny about the prospects of a compromise, reluctant to be seen as obstacles to achieving an item that polls show has broad support. Really, and what polls would those be? The last four I've seen showed people overwhelmingly want enforcement, not amnesty.
To: sheana
"The GOP position has moved far to the right? since last year, said Sen. Robert Menendez (news, bio, voting record), R-N.J
That really means alot coming from a DEMOCRAT./sar
16
posted on
05/10/2007 6:10:11 PM PDT
by
RedMonqey
( The truth is never PC)
To: NormsRevenge
“Immigration compromise falters on hill”
Good. And lets hope all upcoming ones do the same
17
posted on
05/10/2007 6:55:54 PM PDT
by
Bogtrotter52
(Reading DU daily so you won't hafta)
To: VictoryGal
18
posted on
05/10/2007 6:57:30 PM PDT
by
Ron H.
(Cheap labor will be our undoing!)
To: NormsRevenge
Im sure our petitions, emails and phone calls have a lot to do with this.
It’s about time to sign another petition if there’s one out there
19
posted on
05/10/2007 7:40:48 PM PDT
by
tsowellfan
(http://www.cafenetamerica.com)
To: Jim Robinson
"
We dont need any new laws. Just enforce the ones we already have."
This must be sunk. This reckless idea of Bush's had a lot to do with losing congress last year. Hugh Hewitt was right about this before the election.
Being told we need "comprehensive immigration reform" for "jobs Americans won't do" makes my anger 3dB more intense every time I hear that. Seeing ski-masked illegal alien scum attack police in McArthur Park turns my anger from dB into Kilowatts.
20
posted on
05/10/2007 7:49:48 PM PDT
by
BobS
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-44 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson