Skip to comments.
Vanity: Why not refer to "Global Warming" as "Global Alarming"?
Posted on 05/10/2007 10:45:38 AM PDT by 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Global Alarming it is. Good one.
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Vanity: Why not refer to "Global Warming" as "Global Alarming"? Great idea!! It's easy to say and the point can't be missed. I think it might anger a few of the quacks...but that can't be helped, I suppose :-)
22
posted on
05/11/2007 8:37:27 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Shock a lib today. Hand them a copy of the censorship rules imposed by Truman's govt in Jan., 1951.)
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
Have you heard about "global alarming"?
I think that the words are quite charming.
The libs might regret
The course that they've set
'Cause the phrase shows they need "funny farming."
23
posted on
05/11/2007 8:54:04 AM PDT
by
syriacus
(Shock a lib today. Hand them a copy of the censorship rules imposed by Truman's govt in Jan., 1951.)
To: syriacus
Great idea!! It’s easy to say and the point can’t be missed. I think it might anger a few of the quacks...but that can’t be helped, I suppose :-)
Exactly my thoughts. I was thinking of some possible comparisons. I honestly don’t know what came first of
— pro-abortion
— pro-choice
— anti-abortion
— pro-life
But I suspect that the pro-abort crowd at some point realized that “choice” sounded better than “abortion” and that the good guys realized that to be “Pro” life sounded better than to be “Anti” abortion. So the labels have stuck and to a large extent framed the arguments (”It’s not a choice it’s a baby”).
I think we should adopt “Global Alarming” as a means of framing the argument in our favor - it conveys the needed message, does it in a catchy way, and turns the enviro-whackos arguments back on themselves.
Thanks.
To: 2 Kool 2 Be 4-Gotten
I think we should adopt Global Alarming as a means of framing the argument in our favor - it conveys the needed message, does it in a catchy way, and turns the enviro-whackos arguments back on themselves. I agree.
25
posted on
05/11/2007 5:36:31 PM PDT
by
syriacus
(Shock a lib today. Hand them a copy of the censorship rules imposed by Truman's govt in Jan., 1951.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-25 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson