[Lexinom]

Read your history book. The answer is simple: the ban is enforced against providers, just like it always was up until the 1970's (a little earlier in a couple states).

The business about women being prosecuted is a strawman.

Coat hangers? That's their choice - a stupid one, to be sure. But one thing is certain: along with the ban we need to change the culture, the way sex is portrayed. Eliminating the ability to rid oneself of the consequences of one's action by eliminating an innocent life gives a good start.

Your "reality" is a fantasy world devoid of any but the young, the perfect, and the selfish. No down syndrome folks, no muscular dystrophy folks, no spina biffida folks, only a perfectly bred archetype. A eugenicist's dreamworld. Who among us would be deemed unfit, as we cannot protect even the weakest and most vulnerable?

[LightBeam]

Read your history book. The answer is simple: the ban is enforced against providers, just like it always was up until the 1970's (a little earlier in a couple states). The business about women being prosecuted is a strawman.

This is true, although it ultimately needs to be changed as well. We don't allow people to hire hitmen to murder their children and then only punish the hitmen. That would be outrageous.

But I do agree, Rootys ship is sunk. Not a moment too soon, either.