My rebuttals are all posted here on FR if you care to reading them!:)
And you claim on another thread to not be a spinning Mormon Apologist? Ooookay
First you declined to support your claim by objecting that, if you did, I would shower you with endless objections.
I removed that problem by promising to introduce no comment at all on your evidence.
Now you decline to support your claim by objecting that you've already supported it elsewhere -- while effectively preventing its discovery by supplying no practical means of unearthing it, ie. you provide no links to your evidence.
By requiring others to search through hundreds or thousands of your FR posts in search of even one instance of restornu's evidence against the Tanners, you provide others with no reasonable or practical way to hear you out.
Who is treating whom to endless objections?
Your continued stonewalling makes it plain that you have placed a gag order on the evidence for your own claim. Either that, or you simply have no evidence to present.
If you do not support your argument, then you have no argument.
On this forum, claims can only be taken seriously when supported with evidence -- including the claim that you have posted this evidence in the past.
Where is the evidence, ie. the links, for that claim?