“You’re deeply in denial about Reagan’s actual record.”
You need to produce some actual evidence of that assertion.
I’ve read the actual legislation.
It is close to what most pro-lifers would like abortion law to be TODAY. Thus, it’s disingenuous to call it “pro-abort” or “pro-choice.”
On the other hand, perhaps, by your definition, Mr. Reagan WAS pro-choice, in that he accepted, in 1967, that abortion should be available in cases of rape, incest, and when a woman’s health was gravely threatened by continued pregnancy.
Of course, by that definition, you’ve just labeled most actual pro-lifers - folks who would make illegal 96+% of abortions - as “pro-choice.”
Go ahead and pretend that moderate pro-lifers - folks who would ban 96+% of abortions - are actually “pro-choice.”
Go ahead and pretend that these folks are the equivalent of folks - like Mitt Romney (at least from 1970 - 2005) - who believe that abortion should be generally legal, that it is a woman's "right."
sitetest
Gosh, I come back to FR, and what do I see: Romniacs once again dissing Ronald Reagan to try and somehow elevate their liberal candidate. No different than what the Rooty-toots attempted here in recent months, and so signally failed to accomplish.